Difference between revisions of "EEB 5370: big questions in cons bio (Spring 2020)"
From EEBedia
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<td style="border-color: #000000; width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="border-color: #000000; width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>[https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0169-5347%2819%2930299-X Sutherland et al. 2020. TREE.] | + | <li>[https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0169-5347%2819%2930299-X Sutherland et al. 2020. TREE.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td style="border-color: #000000; width: 201.417px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="border-color: #000000; width: 201.417px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/05/biodiversity-in-2020-the-biggest-threats-and-opportunities-aoe As reported in The Guardian]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 128px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 128px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x Sutherland et al. 2006. JApE.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x Sutherland et al. 2009. Cons Biol.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.cpsg.org/sites/cbsg.org/files/2013_AM/Sutherland%20&%20Woodroof%202009.pdf Sutherland and Woodroof 2009. TREE.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/37/1/7/1656872 van Rij. 2010. Sci Pub Policy.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x Sutherland et al. 2011. MEE.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.18539!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/526317a.pdf Sutherland and Burgman. 2015. Nature.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td style="width: 201.417px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rin3vRK2GFQ Video to watch]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022998 Burgman et al. 2011]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/2041-210X.12387 Mukherjee et al. 2015. MEE]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 104px;">Supplemental reading on focus groups: | + | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 104px;">Supplemental reading on focus groups: [https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 Nyumba et al. 2017]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr style="height: 56px;"> | <tr style="height: 56px;"> | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031824&type=printable Sutherland et al. 2011. PLoS One.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/CF3EF3EC23A9E50983A16EF4EC5FCD1F/S0030605311001724a.pdf/enhancing_the_value_of_horizon_scanning_through_collaborative_review.pdf Sutherland et al. 2012. Oryx.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/61/4/290/324883 Fleishman et al. 2011. BioScience.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/3/219/224584 Rudd and Fleishman 2014. BioScience.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
<td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td> | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td> | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td> | ||
− | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"> | + | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"> [https://ctcnr.weebly.com/ Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr style="height: 56px;"> | <tr style="height: 56px;"> | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ Kark et al. 2016. PLoS One.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534709003206 Sutherland et al. 2010. TREE.]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534718302842 Sutherland et al. 2019. TREE.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
<td style="width: 77.1667px; height: 56px;">6 Apr</td> | <td style="width: 77.1667px; height: 56px;">6 Apr</td> | ||
<td style="width: 131.283px; height: 56px;">Amanda</td> | <td style="width: 131.283px; height: 56px;">Amanda</td> | ||
− | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 56px;">Q & A with | + | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 56px;">Q & A with [https://energy.colostate.edu/people/erica-fleishman/ Erica Fleishman]</td> |
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> |
Latest revision as of 20:40, 24 August 2021
This year focused on reading papers that aim to identify the most important topics in the field of conservation. These papers fall into two categories: (1) formal assessments to identify the top questions, conducted by canvassing scientists and practitioners in the field, and (2) horizon scanning efforts to try to predict what questions will become important before they do. In addition to looking at the results of these efforts, we read papers that describe the methods used to do these assessments, and those that have evaluated how influential the assessments have been.
Week | Who | Topic | Reading | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 Jan | Chris E. | Introduction | ||
3 Feb | Claire | Early prioritizations | ||
10 Feb | Kayla | Horizon scanning | ||
17 Feb | Jessica | Extracting information from experts | ||
24 Feb | Lucas | Delphi technique | Supplemental reading on focus groups: Nyumba et al. 2017 | |
2 Mar | Laura | Influencing policy | ||
9 Mar | Eliza | US priorities | ||
16 Mar | ---- | SPRING BREAK | ---- | Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources |
23 Mar | Hannah | Broad patterns | Collate questions | |
30 Mar | Ben | Does scanning work? | ||
6 Apr | Amanda | Q & A with Erica Fleishman |
|
Propose horizons for next week |
13 Apr | Sam | Discuss your horizon issues |
|
Rank horizons for next week |
20 Apr | Jackie | Rank and discuss responses to survey questions |
|
|
27 Apr | Everyone | Revisit survey and wrap up |
|
|
4 May | Anyone who's interested | Plans for next CCNR??? | Optional | |