Difference between revisions of "EEB 5370: big questions in cons bio (Spring 2020)"
From EEBedia
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 128px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 128px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01188.x Sutherland et al. 2006. JApE.]</li> |
− | <li>[https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x | + | <li>[https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01212.x Sutherland et al. 2009. Cons Biol.]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
<td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td> | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td> | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td> | ||
− | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"> [https://ctcnr.weebly.com/ | + | <td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"> [https://ctcnr.weebly.com/ Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr style="height: 56px;"> | <tr style="height: 56px;"> | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
<td style="width: 77.1667px; height: 56px;">6 Apr</td> | <td style="width: 77.1667px; height: 56px;">6 Apr</td> | ||
<td style="width: 131.283px; height: 56px;">Amanda</td> | <td style="width: 131.283px; height: 56px;">Amanda</td> | ||
− | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 56px;">Q & A with | + | <td style="width: 156.333px; height: 56px;">Q & A with [https://energy.colostate.edu/people/erica-fleishman/ Erica Fleishman]</td> |
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> |
Latest revision as of 20:40, 24 August 2021
This year focused on reading papers that aim to identify the most important topics in the field of conservation. These papers fall into two categories: (1) formal assessments to identify the top questions, conducted by canvassing scientists and practitioners in the field, and (2) horizon scanning efforts to try to predict what questions will become important before they do. In addition to looking at the results of these efforts, we read papers that describe the methods used to do these assessments, and those that have evaluated how influential the assessments have been.
Week | Who | Topic | Reading | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 Jan | Chris E. | Introduction | ||
3 Feb | Claire | Early prioritizations | ||
10 Feb | Kayla | Horizon scanning | ||
17 Feb | Jessica | Extracting information from experts | ||
24 Feb | Lucas | Delphi technique | Supplemental reading on focus groups: Nyumba et al. 2017 | |
2 Mar | Laura | Influencing policy | ||
9 Mar | Eliza | US priorities | ||
16 Mar | ---- | SPRING BREAK | ---- | Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources |
23 Mar | Hannah | Broad patterns | Collate questions | |
30 Mar | Ben | Does scanning work? | ||
6 Apr | Amanda | Q & A with Erica Fleishman |
|
Propose horizons for next week |
13 Apr | Sam | Discuss your horizon issues |
|
Rank horizons for next week |
20 Apr | Jackie | Rank and discuss responses to survey questions |
|
|
27 Apr | Everyone | Revisit survey and wrap up |
|
|
4 May | Anyone who's interested | Plans for next CCNR??? | Optional | |