CONTENTS
Abstracts only
- Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and
investigator bias--- David M. Hillis
- Is it better to add taxa or characters to a
difficult phylogenetic problem?--- Anna Graybeal
- Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxon
sampling--- Steven Poe
- Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an
empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms--- Douglas E. Soltis,
Pamela S. Soltis, Mark E. Mort, Mark W. Chase, Vincent Savolainen, Sara B. Hoot, and
Cynthia M. Morton
- Download .pdf version of Soltis et al. Table 1
- Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance
of phylogenetic estimators--- Junhyong Kim
- Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny,
and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences--- Gavin J. P. Naylor and Wesley M. Brown
- A fast method for approximating maximum
likelihoods of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences--- James S. Rogers and David L. Swofford
- Morphology, molecules, and the phylogenetics of
cetaceans--- Sharon L. Messenger and Jimmy A. McGuire
- Download text only Messenger and McGuire data matrix
- On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis
--- Ziheng Yang
POINTS OF VIEW
- Long-branch distraction and the Strepsiptera--- Michael F. Whiting
- Lagomorphs misplaced by more characters and fewer taxa--- Kenneth M. Halanych
- On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny--- F. James Rholf
- On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: a reply to Rholf--- Miriam Leah Zelditch, William L. Fink, Donald L. Swiderski, and Barbara L. Lundrigan
- Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995)--- Dean C. Adams and Michael S. Rosenberg
This page maintained by SSB.
Last modified 6 April 1998.