Difference between revisions of "Vertlunch"
From EEBedia
EricSchultz (Talk | contribs) (→The Spring 2009 Edition) |
EricSchultz (Talk | contribs) (→The Spring 2009 Edition) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
KW says: I think the attached paper would make a good starting point for vert lunch this Friday, since it is a study by a student at Texas that refutes Mike Ryan’s now widely accepted notion of frog calls evolving through sensory exploitation. | KW says: I think the attached paper would make a good starting point for vert lunch this Friday, since it is a study by a student at Texas that refutes Mike Ryan’s now widely accepted notion of frog calls evolving through sensory exploitation. | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | <br/> | ||
January 28<br/> | January 28<br/> | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 21 January 2009
The Vertlunch page
This page is for use of participants in EEB 6480 Seminar in Vertebrate Biology a.k.a. the Vert Lunch.
- To upload a pdf use this form (note that you will be asked for username and password to access the form)
- To add a link to a journal article, review the instructions for hypertext links in Help.
The Spring 2009 Edition
January 21
- Ron, S.R. 2008. The evolution of female mate choice for complex calls in tungara frogs. Animal Behaviour 76: 1783-1794.
KW says: I think the attached paper would make a good starting point for vert lunch this Friday, since it is a study by a student at Texas that refutes Mike Ryan’s now widely accepted notion of frog calls evolving through sensory exploitation.
January 28
February 6
February 13
February 20
February 27
March 6
March 20
March 27
April 3
April 10
April 17
April 24
