Difference between revisions of "Systematics Seminar"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This is the home page of the UConn EEB department's Co-evolution Seminar, taking the place of the Systematics Seminar this semester (EEB 6486). This is a graduate seminar devoted to issues of interest to graduate students and faculty who make up the systematics program at the University of Connecticut.  
 
This is the home page of the UConn EEB department's Co-evolution Seminar, taking the place of the Systematics Seminar this semester (EEB 6486). This is a graduate seminar devoted to issues of interest to graduate students and faculty who make up the systematics program at the University of Connecticut.  
 +
<br><br>
 +
'''Seminar Format:''' Registered students should sign up for a subject/week by the 10th of February.  Because we may have more students than available class sessions, it may be necessary to co-lead some sessions. If you are interested in more than one subject, feel free to sign up for two sessions.
 +
 +
The leader(s) will be responsible both for (1) selection of readings, (2) an introductory presentation, (3) driving discussion and (4) setting up and putting away the projector. 
 +
 +
'''Readings:''' In consultation with the instructors, each leader should assign one primary paper /chapter for discussion and up to two other ancillary papers or resources.  The readings should be posted to EEBedia at least a week in advance.
 +
 +
'''Introductory PowerPoint:''' Introduce your topic with a 10- to 15-minute PowerPoint.  Dedicate at least 2/3 of that time to placing the subject into the broader context of the subject areas/themes and at most 1/3 of it introducing paper, special definitions, taxa, methods, etc. Never exceed 15 minutes.  (For example, for a reading on figs and fig-wasps, broaden the scope to plant-herbivore co-evolution.).  Add images, include short movie clips, visit web resources, etc. to keep the presentation engaging.  Although your presentation should not be a review of the primary reading, showing key figures from the readings may be helpful (and appreciated).  You may also want to provide more detail and background about ancillary readings which likely have not been read by all.
 +
 +
'''Discussion:''' You are responsible for driving the discussion.  Assume everyone in attendance has read the paper. There are excellent suggestions for generating class discussions on Chris Elphick’s Current Topics in Conservation Biology course site.  See section under expectations. 
 +
 +
Prepare 3-5 questions that you expect will spur discussion.  Ideally, you would distribute questions the Friday before our class meeting.
 +
 +
'''Projector:'''
 +
The presenter will be responsible for setting up the projector for each class session—you will need to get it from the EEB office, make sure you have appropriate adaptors and have it set up so that class can begin on schedule. Kathy has reserved the pink projector for our class. If you do not have a laptop, let Wagner know and he will bring his. (Nick McIntosh may also be able to provide a loaner.)
 +
 +
'''Themes of the seminar will include:'''
 +
* methods for detecting co-speciation (or the lack thereof)
 +
* the evolutionary consequences of mutualisms, e.g., to evolutionary diversification and extinction
 +
* when we should expect to find signals of co-speciation
 +
* what evolutionary forces resist coevolution
 +
  
 
[[Systematics Listserv|Click here for information about joining and using the Systematics email list]]
 
[[Systematics Listserv|Click here for information about joining and using the Systematics email list]]
  
 
== Meeting time and place ==
 
== Meeting time and place ==
For the Spring 2015 semester, we are meeting in the '''Bamford Room (TLS 171B) Day/time TBD'''
+
For the Spring 2015 semester, we are meeting in the '''Bamford Room (TLS 171B) Tuesdays at 4'''
  
 
=== Topics ===
 
=== Topics ===
 
This seminar will be split between class meetings that emphasize phylogenetic underpinnings, tree comparisons, and reconciliation methods, with those focused on the evolutionary processes underlying co-evolutionary phenomena (as well as the forces and circumstances that, more often than not, prevent it from occurring). And while parasites will figure large in our readings and discussions, we will also explore insect-plant co-evolution, endosymbionts and other mutualisms, mimicry, and others.  
 
This seminar will be split between class meetings that emphasize phylogenetic underpinnings, tree comparisons, and reconciliation methods, with those focused on the evolutionary processes underlying co-evolutionary phenomena (as well as the forces and circumstances that, more often than not, prevent it from occurring). And while parasites will figure large in our readings and discussions, we will also explore insect-plant co-evolution, endosymbionts and other mutualisms, mimicry, and others.  
 +
 +
=== Books ===
 +
*Futuyma, D. J. and M. Slatkin. 1983. Introduction. Pp. 1-13. In: D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin (eds.) Coevolution. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
 +
*Gilbert, L. E. and P. H. Raven. 1980. Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX. 263 pp. [revised edition of 1975 book].
 +
*Page, R. D. M. 2003. Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution.  University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
 +
*Price, P. W. 1980. Evolutionary Biology of Parasites, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
 +
*Thompson, J. N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process.  University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
 +
*Thompson, J. N. 2014. Interaction and Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL [reprint of 1982 book].
 +
*Also…be on the lookout for: Clayton, D. H., S. E. Bush, and K. P. Johnson. Coevolution of Life on Hosts: Integrating Ecology and History. University of Chicago Press.
 +
  
 
=== Tuesday, 20 January 2015 ===
 
=== Tuesday, 20 January 2015 ===
Line 53: Line 85:
 
=== Monday, 1 December 2014===
 
=== Monday, 1 December 2014===
 
-->
 
-->
 +
 +
=== Some other papers ===
 +
*Balbuena, J. A., R. Míguez-Lozano, and I. Blasco-Costa. 2013. PACo: A novel Procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8: e61048.
 +
*Banks, J. C., R. L. Palma, and A. M. Paterson. 2006. Cophylogenetic relationships between penguins and their chewing lice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 156–166.
 +
*Brockhurst, M. A. and B. Koskella. 2013. Experimental coevolution of species interaction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 28: 367-375.
 +
*Brooks, D. R. 1979. Testing the context and extent of host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Zoology 28: 299–307.
 +
*Brooks, D. R. 1981. Hennig's parasitological method: a proposed solution. Systematic Zoology 30: 229–249.
 +
*Brooks, D. R., M. G. P. van Veller, and D. A. McLennan. 2001. How to do BPA, really. Journal of Biogeography 28: 345–358. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00545.x
 +
*Charleston, M. 1998. Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Mathematical Biosciences 149: 191-223.
 +
*Charleston, M. A. 2002. Principles of cophylogenetic maps.  Biological Evolution and Statistical Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics.  585: 122-147.
 +
*Charleston, M. A. 2003. Recent results in cophylogeny mapping. Advances in Parasitology 54: 303–330. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(03)54007-6.
 +
*Charleston, M., and D. Robertson. 2002. Preferential host switching by primate lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 528–535.
 +
*Clark, M. A., N. A. Moran, P. Baumann, and J. J. Wernegreen. 2000. Cospeciation between bacterial endosymbionts (Buchnera) and a recent radiation of aphids (Uroleucon) and pitfalls of testing for phylogenetic congruence. Evolution 54: 517-525.
 +
*Clayton, D. H., and K. P. Johnson. 2003. Linking coevolutionary history to ecological process: doves and lice. Evolution 57: 2335–2341.
 +
*Conow, C., D. Fielder, Y. Ovadia, and R. Libeskind-Hadas. 2010. Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 5: 16–26.
 +
*Demastes, J. W., T. A. Spradling, M. S. Hafner, G. R. Spies, D. J. Hafner, and J. E. Light. 2012. Cophylogeny on a fine scale: Goemydoecus chewing lice and their pocket gopher hosts, Pappogeomys bulleri. Journal of Parasitology 98: 262–270.
 +
*Ehrlich, P. R. and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
 +
*Eichler, W. 1948. Some rules in ectoparasitism. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 12) 1: 588–598.
 +
*Futuyma, D. J. and M. Slatkin. 1983. Introduction. Pp. 1-13. In: D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin (eds.) Coevolution. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
 +
*Gustafsson, D. R., and U. Olsson. 2012. Flyway homogenisation or differentiation? Insights from the phylogeny of the sandpiper (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae: Calidrinae) wing louse genus Lunaceps (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera). International Journal for Parasitology 42: 93–102.
 +
*Hafner, M. S., and S. A. Nadler. 1988. Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts. Nature 332: 258-259.
 +
*Hafner, M. S., and R. D. M. Page. 1995. Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as a model system. Royal Society Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 349: 77–83.
 +
*Harbison, C. W., and D. H. Clayton. 2011. Community interactions govern host-switching with implications for host-parasite coevolutionary history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 9525–9529. doi: 10.2307/25831263
 +
*Hommola, K., J. E. Smith, Y. Qiu, and W. R. Gilks. 2009. A permutation test of host-parasite cospeciation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp062
 +
*Hughes, J., M. Kennedy, K. P. Johnson, R. L. Palma, and R. D. M. Page. 2007. Multiple cophylogenetic analyses reveal frequent cospeciation between pelecaniform birds and Pectinopygus lice. Systematic Biology 56: 232-251.
 +
*Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution 54: 352–364. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00039.x
 +
*Johnson, K. P., R. J. Adams, R. D. M. Page, and D. H. Clayton. 2003. When do parasites fail to speciate in response to host speciation? Systematic Biology 52: 37–47. doi: 10.1080/10635150390132704
 +
*Johnson, K. P., J. D. Weckstein, M. J. Meyer, and D. H. Clayton. 2011. There and back again: switching between host orders by avian body lice (Ischnocera: Goniodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102: 614–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01612.x
 +
*Legendre, P., Y. Desdevises, and E. Bazin. 2002. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Biology 51: 217–234. doi: 10.1080/10635150252899734
 +
*Light, J. E., and M. S. Hafner. 2007. Cophylogeny and disparate rates of evolution in sympatric lineages of chewing lice on pocket gophers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.001
 +
*Light, J. E., and M. S. Hafner. 2008. Codivergence in heteromyid rodents (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) and their sucking lice of the genus Fahrenholzia (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). Systematic Biology 57: 449-465. doi: 10.1080/10635150802169610
 +
*Janzen, D. H. 1980. What is coevolution? Evolution. 34: 611-612.
 +
*Manter, H. W. 1966. Parasites of fishes as biological indicators of recent and ancient conditions. Pp. 59–71. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Biology Colloquium on Host-Parasite Relationships, Oregon State University Biology Colloquium.
 +
*McCutcheon, J. P., B. R. McDonald, and N. A. Moran. 2009. Convergent evolution of metabolic roles in bacterial co-symbionts of insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences America USA 106: 15394-15399.
 +
*McCutcheon, J. P., and N. A. Moran. 2007. Parallel genomic evolution and metabolic interdependence in an ancient symbiosis. of the National Academy of Sciences America USA 104: 19392-19397.
 +
*Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., A. F. Auch, D. H. Huson, and M. Göker. 2007. CopyCat: cophylogenetic analysis tool. Bioinformatics 23: 898–900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm027
 +
*Merkle, D., and M. Middendorf. 2005. Reconstruction of the cophylogenetic history of related phylogenetic trees with divergence timing information. Theory in Biosciences 123: 277–299. doi: 10.1016/j.thbio.2005.01.003
 +
*Morse, S. F., C. W. Dick, B. D. Patterson, and K. Dittmar. 2012. Some like it hot: Evolution and ecology of novel endosymbionts in bat flies of cave-roosting bats (Hippoboscoidea, Nycterophiliinae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78: 8639-8649.
 +
*Page, R. D. M. 1994. Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10: 155-173.
 +
*Page, R. D. M., and M. S. Hafner. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as a model system. Pp. p. 255–270. In New Uses for New Phylogenies, P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
 +
*Page, R. D. M., P. L. M. Lee, S. A. Becher, R. Griffiths, and D. H. Clayton. 1998. A different tempo of mitochondrial DNA evolution in birds and their parasitic lice. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 276–293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1997.0458
 +
*Paterson, A., G. Wallis, L. Wallis, and R. Gray. 2000. Seabird louse coevolution: complex histories revealed by 12S rRNA sequences and reconciliation analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 383- 399.
 +
*Reed, D. L., and M. S. Hafner. 1997. Host specificity of chewing lice on pocket gophers: a potential mechanism for cospeciation. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 655–660. doi: 10.2307/1382916
 +
*Ricklefs, R. E., S. M. Fallon, and E. Bermingham. 2004. Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Systematic Biology 53: 111–119. doi: 10.1080/10635150490264987
 +
*Schardl, C. L., K. D. Craven, S. Speakman, A. Stromberg, A. Lindstrom, and R. Yoshida. 2008. A novel test for host-symbiont codivergence indicates ancient origin of fungal endophytes in grasses. Systematic Biology 57: 483–498. doi: 10.1080/10635150802172184
 +
*Sloan, D. B., and N. A. Moran. 2012. Genome reduction and co-evolution between the primary and secondary bacterial symbionts of psyllids. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 3781-3792.
 +
*Takiya, D. M., P. L. Tran, C. H. Dietrich, and N. A. Moran. 2006. Co-cladogenesis spanning three phyla: leafhoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and their dual bacterial symbionts. Molecular Biology 15: 4175-4191.
 +
*Thompson, J. N. 2012. The role of coevolution. Science 335: 410-411.
 +
*Thompson, J. N. 2014. Natural selection, coevolution, and the web of life. American Naturalist 183: iv-v.
 +
*Thompson, J. N. 2014. Coevolution and speciation. Pp. 535-542. In Losos, J. B. (ed.) The Princeton Guide to Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
 +
*Urban, J. M., and J. R. Cryan. 2012. Two ancient bacterial endosymbionts have coevolved with the planthoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea). BMC Evolutionary Biology 12:87.
 +
*Weckstein, J. D. 2004. Biogeography explains cophylogenetic patterns in toucan chewing lice. Systematic Biology 53: 154–164. doi: 10.1080/10635150490265085
 +
*Whiteman, N. K., D. Santiago-Alarcon, K. P. Johnson, and P. G. Parker. 2004. Differences in straggling rates between two genera of dove lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) reinforce population genetic and cophylogenetic patterns. International Journal for Parasitology 34: 1113-1119.
  
 
== Past Systematics Seminars ==
 
== Past Systematics Seminars ==

Revision as of 21:00, 31 January 2015

This is the home page of the UConn EEB department's Co-evolution Seminar, taking the place of the Systematics Seminar this semester (EEB 6486). This is a graduate seminar devoted to issues of interest to graduate students and faculty who make up the systematics program at the University of Connecticut.

Seminar Format: Registered students should sign up for a subject/week by the 10th of February. Because we may have more students than available class sessions, it may be necessary to co-lead some sessions. If you are interested in more than one subject, feel free to sign up for two sessions.

The leader(s) will be responsible both for (1) selection of readings, (2) an introductory presentation, (3) driving discussion and (4) setting up and putting away the projector.

Readings: In consultation with the instructors, each leader should assign one primary paper /chapter for discussion and up to two other ancillary papers or resources. The readings should be posted to EEBedia at least a week in advance.

Introductory PowerPoint: Introduce your topic with a 10- to 15-minute PowerPoint. Dedicate at least 2/3 of that time to placing the subject into the broader context of the subject areas/themes and at most 1/3 of it introducing paper, special definitions, taxa, methods, etc. Never exceed 15 minutes. (For example, for a reading on figs and fig-wasps, broaden the scope to plant-herbivore co-evolution.). Add images, include short movie clips, visit web resources, etc. to keep the presentation engaging. Although your presentation should not be a review of the primary reading, showing key figures from the readings may be helpful (and appreciated). You may also want to provide more detail and background about ancillary readings which likely have not been read by all.

Discussion: You are responsible for driving the discussion. Assume everyone in attendance has read the paper. There are excellent suggestions for generating class discussions on Chris Elphick’s Current Topics in Conservation Biology course site. See section under expectations.

Prepare 3-5 questions that you expect will spur discussion. Ideally, you would distribute questions the Friday before our class meeting.

Projector: The presenter will be responsible for setting up the projector for each class session—you will need to get it from the EEB office, make sure you have appropriate adaptors and have it set up so that class can begin on schedule. Kathy has reserved the pink projector for our class. If you do not have a laptop, let Wagner know and he will bring his. (Nick McIntosh may also be able to provide a loaner.)

Themes of the seminar will include:

  • methods for detecting co-speciation (or the lack thereof)
  • the evolutionary consequences of mutualisms, e.g., to evolutionary diversification and extinction
  • when we should expect to find signals of co-speciation
  • what evolutionary forces resist coevolution


Click here for information about joining and using the Systematics email list

Meeting time and place

For the Spring 2015 semester, we are meeting in the Bamford Room (TLS 171B) Tuesdays at 4

Topics

This seminar will be split between class meetings that emphasize phylogenetic underpinnings, tree comparisons, and reconciliation methods, with those focused on the evolutionary processes underlying co-evolutionary phenomena (as well as the forces and circumstances that, more often than not, prevent it from occurring). And while parasites will figure large in our readings and discussions, we will also explore insect-plant co-evolution, endosymbionts and other mutualisms, mimicry, and others.

Books

  • Futuyma, D. J. and M. Slatkin. 1983. Introduction. Pp. 1-13. In: D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin (eds.) Coevolution. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
  • Gilbert, L. E. and P. H. Raven. 1980. Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX. 263 pp. [revised edition of 1975 book].
  • Page, R. D. M. 2003. Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Price, P. W. 1980. Evolutionary Biology of Parasites, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Thompson, J. N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Thompson, J. N. 2014. Interaction and Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL [reprint of 1982 book].
  • Also…be on the lookout for: Clayton, D. H., S. E. Bush, and K. P. Johnson. Coevolution of Life on Hosts: Integrating Ecology and History. University of Chicago Press.


Tuesday, 20 January 2015

At this meeting we will discuss possible themes for this semester's seminar, and determine the meeting time

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

Pdficon small.gifFutuyma and Slatkin, 1983. Coevolution.
Pdficon small.gifJanzen, 1980. What is coevolution?
Pdficon small.gifEhrlich and Raven, 1964. Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution.

Some other papers

  • Balbuena, J. A., R. Míguez-Lozano, and I. Blasco-Costa. 2013. PACo: A novel Procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8: e61048.
  • Banks, J. C., R. L. Palma, and A. M. Paterson. 2006. Cophylogenetic relationships between penguins and their chewing lice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 156–166.
  • Brockhurst, M. A. and B. Koskella. 2013. Experimental coevolution of species interaction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 28: 367-375.
  • Brooks, D. R. 1979. Testing the context and extent of host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Zoology 28: 299–307.
  • Brooks, D. R. 1981. Hennig's parasitological method: a proposed solution. Systematic Zoology 30: 229–249.
  • Brooks, D. R., M. G. P. van Veller, and D. A. McLennan. 2001. How to do BPA, really. Journal of Biogeography 28: 345–358. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00545.x
  • Charleston, M. 1998. Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Mathematical Biosciences 149: 191-223.
  • Charleston, M. A. 2002. Principles of cophylogenetic maps. Biological Evolution and Statistical Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics. 585: 122-147.
  • Charleston, M. A. 2003. Recent results in cophylogeny mapping. Advances in Parasitology 54: 303–330. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(03)54007-6.
  • Charleston, M., and D. Robertson. 2002. Preferential host switching by primate lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 528–535.
  • Clark, M. A., N. A. Moran, P. Baumann, and J. J. Wernegreen. 2000. Cospeciation between bacterial endosymbionts (Buchnera) and a recent radiation of aphids (Uroleucon) and pitfalls of testing for phylogenetic congruence. Evolution 54: 517-525.
  • Clayton, D. H., and K. P. Johnson. 2003. Linking coevolutionary history to ecological process: doves and lice. Evolution 57: 2335–2341.
  • Conow, C., D. Fielder, Y. Ovadia, and R. Libeskind-Hadas. 2010. Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 5: 16–26.
  • Demastes, J. W., T. A. Spradling, M. S. Hafner, G. R. Spies, D. J. Hafner, and J. E. Light. 2012. Cophylogeny on a fine scale: Goemydoecus chewing lice and their pocket gopher hosts, Pappogeomys bulleri. Journal of Parasitology 98: 262–270.
  • Ehrlich, P. R. and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
  • Eichler, W. 1948. Some rules in ectoparasitism. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 12) 1: 588–598.
  • Futuyma, D. J. and M. Slatkin. 1983. Introduction. Pp. 1-13. In: D. J. Futuyma and M. Slatkin (eds.) Coevolution. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, MA.
  • Gustafsson, D. R., and U. Olsson. 2012. Flyway homogenisation or differentiation? Insights from the phylogeny of the sandpiper (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae: Calidrinae) wing louse genus Lunaceps (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera). International Journal for Parasitology 42: 93–102.
  • Hafner, M. S., and S. A. Nadler. 1988. Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts. Nature 332: 258-259.
  • Hafner, M. S., and R. D. M. Page. 1995. Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as a model system. Royal Society Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 349: 77–83.
  • Harbison, C. W., and D. H. Clayton. 2011. Community interactions govern host-switching with implications for host-parasite coevolutionary history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 9525–9529. doi: 10.2307/25831263
  • Hommola, K., J. E. Smith, Y. Qiu, and W. R. Gilks. 2009. A permutation test of host-parasite cospeciation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp062
  • Hughes, J., M. Kennedy, K. P. Johnson, R. L. Palma, and R. D. M. Page. 2007. Multiple cophylogenetic analyses reveal frequent cospeciation between pelecaniform birds and Pectinopygus lice. Systematic Biology 56: 232-251.
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution 54: 352–364. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00039.x
  • Johnson, K. P., R. J. Adams, R. D. M. Page, and D. H. Clayton. 2003. When do parasites fail to speciate in response to host speciation? Systematic Biology 52: 37–47. doi: 10.1080/10635150390132704
  • Johnson, K. P., J. D. Weckstein, M. J. Meyer, and D. H. Clayton. 2011. There and back again: switching between host orders by avian body lice (Ischnocera: Goniodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102: 614–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01612.x
  • Legendre, P., Y. Desdevises, and E. Bazin. 2002. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Biology 51: 217–234. doi: 10.1080/10635150252899734
  • Light, J. E., and M. S. Hafner. 2007. Cophylogeny and disparate rates of evolution in sympatric lineages of chewing lice on pocket gophers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.001
  • Light, J. E., and M. S. Hafner. 2008. Codivergence in heteromyid rodents (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) and their sucking lice of the genus Fahrenholzia (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). Systematic Biology 57: 449-465. doi: 10.1080/10635150802169610
  • Janzen, D. H. 1980. What is coevolution? Evolution. 34: 611-612.
  • Manter, H. W. 1966. Parasites of fishes as biological indicators of recent and ancient conditions. Pp. 59–71. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Biology Colloquium on Host-Parasite Relationships, Oregon State University Biology Colloquium.
  • McCutcheon, J. P., B. R. McDonald, and N. A. Moran. 2009. Convergent evolution of metabolic roles in bacterial co-symbionts of insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences America USA 106: 15394-15399.
  • McCutcheon, J. P., and N. A. Moran. 2007. Parallel genomic evolution and metabolic interdependence in an ancient symbiosis. of the National Academy of Sciences America USA 104: 19392-19397.
  • Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., A. F. Auch, D. H. Huson, and M. Göker. 2007. CopyCat: cophylogenetic analysis tool. Bioinformatics 23: 898–900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm027
  • Merkle, D., and M. Middendorf. 2005. Reconstruction of the cophylogenetic history of related phylogenetic trees with divergence timing information. Theory in Biosciences 123: 277–299. doi: 10.1016/j.thbio.2005.01.003
  • Morse, S. F., C. W. Dick, B. D. Patterson, and K. Dittmar. 2012. Some like it hot: Evolution and ecology of novel endosymbionts in bat flies of cave-roosting bats (Hippoboscoidea, Nycterophiliinae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78: 8639-8649.
  • Page, R. D. M. 1994. Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10: 155-173.
  • Page, R. D. M., and M. S. Hafner. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: gophers and lice as a model system. Pp. p. 255–270. In New Uses for New Phylogenies, P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Page, R. D. M., P. L. M. Lee, S. A. Becher, R. Griffiths, and D. H. Clayton. 1998. A different tempo of mitochondrial DNA evolution in birds and their parasitic lice. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 276–293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1997.0458
  • Paterson, A., G. Wallis, L. Wallis, and R. Gray. 2000. Seabird louse coevolution: complex histories revealed by 12S rRNA sequences and reconciliation analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 383- 399.
  • Reed, D. L., and M. S. Hafner. 1997. Host specificity of chewing lice on pocket gophers: a potential mechanism for cospeciation. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 655–660. doi: 10.2307/1382916
  • Ricklefs, R. E., S. M. Fallon, and E. Bermingham. 2004. Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Systematic Biology 53: 111–119. doi: 10.1080/10635150490264987
  • Schardl, C. L., K. D. Craven, S. Speakman, A. Stromberg, A. Lindstrom, and R. Yoshida. 2008. A novel test for host-symbiont codivergence indicates ancient origin of fungal endophytes in grasses. Systematic Biology 57: 483–498. doi: 10.1080/10635150802172184
  • Sloan, D. B., and N. A. Moran. 2012. Genome reduction and co-evolution between the primary and secondary bacterial symbionts of psyllids. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 3781-3792.
  • Takiya, D. M., P. L. Tran, C. H. Dietrich, and N. A. Moran. 2006. Co-cladogenesis spanning three phyla: leafhoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and their dual bacterial symbionts. Molecular Biology 15: 4175-4191.
  • Thompson, J. N. 2012. The role of coevolution. Science 335: 410-411.
  • Thompson, J. N. 2014. Natural selection, coevolution, and the web of life. American Naturalist 183: iv-v.
  • Thompson, J. N. 2014. Coevolution and speciation. Pp. 535-542. In Losos, J. B. (ed.) The Princeton Guide to Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
  • Urban, J. M., and J. R. Cryan. 2012. Two ancient bacterial endosymbionts have coevolved with the planthoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea). BMC Evolutionary Biology 12:87.
  • Weckstein, J. D. 2004. Biogeography explains cophylogenetic patterns in toucan chewing lice. Systematic Biology 53: 154–164. doi: 10.1080/10635150490265085
  • Whiteman, N. K., D. Santiago-Alarcon, K. P. Johnson, and P. G. Parker. 2004. Differences in straggling rates between two genera of dove lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) reinforce population genetic and cophylogenetic patterns. International Journal for Parasitology 34: 1113-1119.

Past Systematics Seminars