Difference between revisions of "Science News Summary Questions"
From EEBedia
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | BIO 2289 Science News Summary | + | BIO 2289 Science News Summary 4 |
Name_______________________________________________________ | Name_______________________________________________________ | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | + | In general, when you encounter an article that contains complex information and ideas, do you read on through it, or do you give up and read another article instead? | |
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | + | Was there anything about the article you named above that seemed difficult to understand? | |
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | If your answer to the question above was NO, is that because the subject is simple, or because the reporter did a good job explaining the subject? If your answer to the above was YES, what do you think the reporter could have done to make it easier to understand? | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 15 October 2008
BIO 2289 Science News Summary 4 Name_______________________________________________________
News Article Title_______________________________________________
In general, when you encounter an article that contains complex information and ideas, do you read on through it, or do you give up and read another article instead?
Was there anything about the article you named above that seemed difficult to understand?
If your answer to the question above was NO, is that because the subject is simple, or because the reporter did a good job explaining the subject? If your answer to the above was YES, what do you think the reporter could have done to make it easier to understand?
