Difference between revisions of "Science News Summary Questions"
From EEBedia
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | BIO 2289 Science News Summary | + | BIO 2289 Science News Summary 4 |
Name____________________________________________________ | Name____________________________________________________ | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| − | + | Some REALLY interesting articles in the weeks NY Times Science section, everything from water on Mars to a rise in STDs. Why did you choose the article that you did? Why do you think your article made it into the Science Times section? Was there anything in your article that you think the author "missed" (like not digging deep enough into the story)? Do you think that there was a bias(either intentional or unintentional) by the author in writing the story? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Was there anything | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 19 March 2009
BIO 2289 Science News Summary 4
Name____________________________________________________
News Article Title_______________________________________________
Some REALLY interesting articles in the weeks NY Times Science section, everything from water on Mars to a rise in STDs. Why did you choose the article that you did? Why do you think your article made it into the Science Times section? Was there anything in your article that you think the author "missed" (like not digging deep enough into the story)? Do you think that there was a bias(either intentional or unintentional) by the author in writing the story?
