Difference between revisions of "Science News Summary Questions"
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
ChuckSmith (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | BIO 2289 Science News Summary | + | BIO 2289 Science News Summary 3 |
Name_______________________________________________________ | Name_______________________________________________________ | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| − | + | Lately it seems that a lot of the articles in the Science Times have had a medical slant to them. Why do you think that this is? (there's no right or wrong, just interested in your opinion) | |
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | + | Do you tend to read more of the medical-based articles than the general science-based articles and why (or why not)? | |
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| − | + | Did your article this week make you say "wow, I didn't know that" or "that's pretty cool" (Mine did, about the virtual reality theater). If yours did, what didn't you know or what was especially cool? If you didn't say "wow", what questions did the article at least cause you to generate about the topic? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 24 September 2008
BIO 2289 Science News Summary 3 Name_______________________________________________________
News Article Title_______________________________________________
Lately it seems that a lot of the articles in the Science Times have had a medical slant to them. Why do you think that this is? (there's no right or wrong, just interested in your opinion)
Do you tend to read more of the medical-based articles than the general science-based articles and why (or why not)?
Did your article this week make you say "wow, I didn't know that" or "that's pretty cool" (Mine did, about the virtual reality theater). If yours did, what didn't you know or what was especially cool? If you didn't say "wow", what questions did the article at least cause you to generate about the topic?
