Difference between revisions of "Science News Summary Questions"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
BIO 2289 Science News Summary 1
+
BIO 2289 Science News Summary 6
Name_______________________________________________________
+
 
 +
Name____________________________________________________
  
 
News Article Title_______________________________________________
 
News Article Title_______________________________________________
  
  
There was a really diverse group of articles published in this week’s Science Times. What was it about the article that you chose that drew you to it? Do you think that the artwork or photographs influence which articles you are drawn to?
+
Approximately how long did it take you to read today’s Science Section?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In two sentences or less, identify the questions, or set of questions underlying the research described in the article you named above. If you cannot because they were not clearly defined by the author, say so.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
  
 +
What, if any, information in the article allowed you to judge the credibility (expertise) of the scientist(s) quoted in the piece?
  
  
Line 16: Line 34:
  
  
In two sentences or less, identify the questions or main ideas underlying the article you named above.
+
Did you learn anything from the article that surprised you? If yes, what?

Latest revision as of 18:13, 15 April 2009

BIO 2289 Science News Summary 6

Name____________________________________________________

News Article Title_______________________________________________


Approximately how long did it take you to read today’s Science Section?




In two sentences or less, identify the questions, or set of questions underlying the research described in the article you named above. If you cannot because they were not clearly defined by the author, say so.





What, if any, information in the article allowed you to judge the credibility (expertise) of the scientist(s) quoted in the piece?





Did you learn anything from the article that surprised you? If yes, what?