Difference between revisions of "EEB 5370: sharing-sparing (Spring 2019)"
From EEBedia
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x Kleijn and Sutherland 2003]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cobi.12536 Batáry et al. 2015]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 80px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://beahrselp.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Organic-Agriculture-and-the-Global-food-Supply.pdf Badgley et al. 2007]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://www.pnas.org/content/106/49/20675.short Rudel et al. 2009]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01849.x Ewers et al. 2009]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;"> | <td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li> | + | <li>[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6047/1289 Phalan et al. 2011]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6047/1231 Godfray 2011 commentary]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[http://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6056/593.1/tab-pdf Fischer et al./Hayashi/Phelan et al. follow-up]</li> |
− | <li> | + | <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.13282 Balmford et al. 2019]</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</td> | </td> |
Revision as of 00:37, 14 July 2021
This year, the topic was the debate over land-sharing vs land-sparing. We traced the literature on this topic starting with the initial theoretical work, then looked at applications of the theory in a variety of settings, and closed with the latest ideas on how the approach should be applied.