Difference between revisions of "EEB 5370: big questions in cons bio (Spring 2020)"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 72: Line 72:
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;">
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 104px;">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/2041-210X.12387">Mukherjee et al. 2015. MEE</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/2041-210X.12387 Mukherjee et al. 2015. MEE]</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td style="width: 201.417px; height: 104px;">Supplemental reading on focus groups: <a href="https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.12860">Nyumba et al. 2017</a></td>
+
<td style="width: 201.417px; height: 104px;">Supplemental reading on focus groups: [https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.12860 Nyumba et al. 2017]</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr style="height: 56px;">
 
<tr style="height: 56px;">
Line 83: Line 83:
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031824&amp;type=printable">Sutherland et al. 2011. PLoS One.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031824&amp;type=printable Sutherland et al. 2011. PLoS One.]</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/CF3EF3EC23A9E50983A16EF4EC5FCD1F/S0030605311001724a.pdf/enhancing_the_value_of_horizon_scanning_through_collaborative_review.pdf">Sutherland et al. 2012. Oryx.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/CF3EF3EC23A9E50983A16EF4EC5FCD1F/S0030605311001724a.pdf/enhancing_the_value_of_horizon_scanning_through_collaborative_review.pdf Sutherland et al. 2012. Oryx.]</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 95: Line 95:
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/61/4/290/324883">Fleishman et al. 2011. BioScience.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/61/4/290/324883 Fleishman et al. 2011. BioScience.]</li>
  <li><a href="https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/3/219/224584">Rudd and Fleishman 2014. BioScience.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/3/219/224584 Rudd and Fleishman 2014. BioScience.]</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 106: Line 106:
 
<td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td>
 
<td style="width: 156.333px; height: 48px;">SPRING BREAK</td>
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td>
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 48px;">----</td>
<td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"><a href="https://ctcnr.weebly.com/">Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources</a></td>
+
<td style="width: 201.417px; height: 48px;"> [https://ctcnr.weebly.com/">Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources]</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr style="height: 56px;">
 
<tr style="height: 56px;">
Line 114: Line 114:
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/">Kark et al. 2016. PLoS One.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ Kark et al. 2016. PLoS One.]</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 125: Line 125:
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<td style="width: 380.8px; height: 56px;">
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534709003206">Sutherland et al. 2010. TREE.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534709003206 Sutherland et al. 2010. TREE.]</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534718302842">Sutherland et al. 2019. TREE.</a></li>
+
  <li>[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534718302842 Sutherland et al. 2019. TREE.]</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</td>
 
</td>

Revision as of 18:54, 24 August 2021

This year focused on reading papers that aim to identify the most important topics in the field of conservation. These papers fall into two categories: (1) formal assessments to identify the top questions, conducted by canvassing scientists and practitioners in the field, and (2) horizon scanning efforts to try to predict what questions will become important before they do. In addition to looking at the results of these efforts, we read papers that describe the methods used to do these assessments, and those that have evaluated how influential the assessments have been.

<tbody> </tbody>
Week Who Topic Reading Notes
27 Jan Chris E. Introduction
3 Feb Claire Early prioritizations
10 Feb Kayla Horizon scanning
17 Feb Jessica Extracting information from experts
24 Feb Lucas Delphi technique Supplemental reading on focus groups: Nyumba et al. 2017
2 Mar Laura Influencing policy
9 Mar Eliza US priorities
16 Mar ---- SPRING BREAK ---- ">Connecticut Conference on Natural Resources
23 Mar Hannah Broad patterns Collate questions
30 Mar Ben Does scanning work?
6 Apr Amanda Q & A with <a href="https://energy.colostate.edu/people/erica-fleishman/">Erica Fleishman</a>
  • Prepare and organize questions in advance
Propose horizons for next week
13 Apr Sam Discuss your horizon issues
  • Present your horizon suggestions
Rank horizons for next week
20 Apr Jackie Rank and discuss responses to survey questions
  • Review scoring of horizon topics
  • Review responses from questions survey
27 Apr Everyone Revisit survey and wrap up
4 May Anyone who's interested Plans for next CCNR??? Optional