Difference between revisions of "Current Topics in Conservation Biology"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(EEB 5370: Evidence-based Conservation (Spring 2009))
(Replaced content with "== EEB 5370 == The web page for EEB 5370 has moved to a new site [http://elphick.lab.uconn.edu/eeb-5370-current-topics-in-conservation-biology/ here] for spring 2016. ...")
 
(343 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== EEB 5370: Evidence-based Conservation (Spring 2009) ==
+
== EEB 5370 ==
 
+
'''Credits:''' 1
+
 
+
'''Instructor:''' [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/birdlab/elphick.html Chris Elphick] (email: chris.elphick[AT]uconn.edu)
+
 
+
'''Meeting time:''' Wednesdays 4-5
+
 
+
'''Location:''' Bamford Room (TLS 171B)
+
 
+
The topic of this seminar course varies from year to year depending on what is "current" in conservation biology and what students in the program are interested in focusing on.  Usually we pick a recent book or selected readings focused around a specific theme in order to get a deeper understanding of the topic than would be normal in a survey course.  If you have suggestions for future topics, please let me know.
+
 
+
The course is required for students in the EEB BS/MS program, but is open to all graduate students.  A few senior (and occasionally junior) undergraduates also take the course every year, and I encourage you to do so if you are interested.  To be eligible as an undergraduate, you should have at least a B average and should talk to me first.  Undergraduates will need a permission number to enroll.  The course is limited to ~12-15 students each year and I occasionally have to turn people away, but we try to accommodate as many people as possible.  Priority is given to students in the BS/MS program who need the course to graduate.  Post-docs, adjuncts, and (even) faculty are welcome to join in the fun.
+
 
+
This semester we will examine evidence-based conservation (EBC).  EBC is an emerging approach for improving the degree to which scientific evidence is actually used in conservation management and decision making.  It uses techniques that have resulted in substantial changes over the past couple of decades in the way that medicine is practiced, and which have subsequently been poached by other fields.  To learn a little about the topic, check out the web sites for [http://www.environmentalevidence.org/index.htm Environmental Evidence], [http://www.conservationevidence.com/index.shtm Conservation Evidence], and the [http://www.cebc.bangor.ac.uk/index.php.en?menu=0&catid=0 Center for Evidence-based Conservation].
+
 
+
In the course we will read about the rationale for EBC, examine the techniques used, look at some case studies, and then student groups will develop small projects of their own (ideally related to their own research interests) to try out the methods.
+
 
+
== Schedule (subject to change) ==
+
 
+
During the first half of the semester we will read papers on the evidence-based approach, finishing up with a couple of case studies.  Most of these papers come from the group at the [http://www.cebc.bangor.ac.uk/ Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation].  While we are doing this, I'd also like everyone in the class to develop a small project that they will present during the second half of the semester.  For the projects, people can work individually or in pairs.  Ideally, projects should be based on something related to your own research or career interests.  If you have no ideas, ask me for suggestions.
+
 
+
The project should take the form of a systematic review of the evidence for some conservation management action.  Discussions during the first half of the semester will provide guidance on how to do this.  The final presentation should include description of (a) the general problem, (b) how you broke the problem down into specific questions, and which of those you then tackled, (c) how you searched the literature for evidence, (d) what evidence you found, (e) how you summarized the evidence, and most importantly (f) what specific recommendations you would give to conservation practitioners and why (simply suggesting more research is not an option here). 
+
 
+
For the presentations, you should prepare a short PowerPoint slide show (10-12 slides, max) to provide the required information.  My expectation is that presentations will involve a back-and-forth discussion between the presenter and the rest of the group, rather than a one-way flow of information.  The audience's goal is to provide (constructive) feedback on the approach taken for the review.  We should help the presenter determine what more they could do to aid managers make good decisions if they were to proceed further with the review.
+
 
+
A tentative schedule is posted below. Everyone should sign up to share leadership roles for one week during the first half of the semester (we will probably have two students per session) and to present their project during one week in the second half of the semester.
+
 
+
If you have EEBedia editing rights then you can go in and sign up to present yourself.  If you do not, email me and tell me when you'd like to lead so that I can put you on the schedule.  If you are flexible on your topic/date, then include a note so that others know they can move things around.  DO NOT MOVE ANYONE TO A DIFFERENT SLOT WITHOUT ASKING THEM FIRST.  After the first meeting, I will assign weeks to anyone who has not yet signed up.
+
 
+
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
+
!width="75"|Week
+
!width="100"|Who
+
!width="300"|Topic
+
!width="180"|Reading
+
!width="420"|Notes
+
|-
+
|21st Jan || Chris || Why "evidence-based"? || [http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/series/the_evidence_gap/index.html The Evidence Gap] (Read 2+ articles - but, not just the first two)|| These New York Times articles discuss the use of evidence in medicine, which is where many ideas in evidence-based conservation originate.
+
|-
+
|28th Jan ||  || Introduction to the evidence-based approach || [http://www.conbio.org/smithfellows/pdf/conservation_medicine.pdf Pullin & Knight 2001] Pullin & Knight 2003 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VJ1-4C47MXM-2&_user=669286&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036298&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=669286&md5=27c3ac3380abbdc0fd6e8675f62e7ae0 Sutherland et al. 2004]  ||  These early papers collectively set the scene for the class.
+
|-
+
|4th Feb || || Isn't evidence used already? || [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-4BBVVV8-1&_user=669286&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036298&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=669286&md5=3366182ff12860df8ba16b755b51b42a Pullin et al. 2004]  [http://www.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/322/7278/98?ck=nck Pettigrew 2001] ||
+
|-
+
|11th Feb ||  || How to do reviews || [http://www.cebc.bangor.ac.uk/Documents/Reviewguidelinesversion3.0_FINAL_000.pdf Pullin et al. 2008] || See also [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120829710/PDFSTART Pullin et al. 2006] (an earlier version, published in Conservation Biology)
+
|-
+
|18th Feb || || Gathering and analyzing data || ||
+
|-
+
|25th Feb || || Case studies: wind farm impacts on birds; ???? || [http://journals.cambridge.org/download.php?file=%2FENC%2FENC34_01%2FS0376892907003554a.pdf&code=77e5d540de7748cae4a6c55bf429b91c Stewart et al. 2007] plus another || We'll pick another 1-2 case studies to discuss, based on what the group is interested in.
+
|-
+
|4th Mar || || How good are conservation reviews? || [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-4K5ST89-1&_user=669286&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036298&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=669286&md5=d65a5ce2ad419def27c7438ca9c2676b Roberts et al. 2006] [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V5X-4GMS9DK-3&_user=669286&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036298&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=669286&md5=5edfa58afec1f387a76a7957a11ee54a Stewart et al. 2005]|| Depending on how many projects we have, we may do a second week of case studies and postpone this project until after the break.
+
 
+
|-
+
|11th Mar || ---- ||  NO MEETING: SPRING BREAK || ---- ||
+
|-
+
|18th Mar || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|25th  Mar || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|1st Apr || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|8th  Apr || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|15th Apr || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|22nd Apr || || Project presentations || ||
+
|-
+
|29th Apr || || What have we learned? || ||
+
|-
+
|}
+
 
+
 
+
== Expectations ==
+
 
+
NOTE THAT THE REST OF THIS WEB SITE HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED FOR 2009 YET.
+
 
+
Each week we will read papers and discuss them in class.  Most discussions will be led by students, and everyone is expected to sign up for a week to lead the discussion.  The schedule is posted below. 
+
 
+
'''Discussion leaders:''' My expectation is that you will present a 5-10 minute (NO MORE!) introduction to the topic.  Your introduction should draw on the readings, but should not simply re-state what we have all read.  Simply reiterating what the readings say is boring and doesn't accomplish much.  Instead, your job as leader is to get a discussion going.  This is hard (and I will help), but far more interesting for everyone involved.  Here are some tips:
+
 
+
* Make sure that you have enough to say to keep things moving, but do not feel that you have to say everything that you have thought of or cover every idea in the readings.  If the conversation is going well, let it.  The worst thing that can happen is that no one says anything.  The next worst thing is that the leader completely dominates the conversation (I can be guilty of this sin myself, so feel free to cut me off if I'm talking too much).
+
 
+
* In your introduction, try to synthesize the material and draw out the major points. What are the 5 things you'd tell your parents if you were going to explain this to them over dinner - the chances are good that these are the same things we should be focused on.  Also, feel free to supplement the reading material with other information on the topic to broaden the discussion.
+
 
+
* Come with a list of questions to ask (more than you think you'll need).  The more specific the questions are the better, as this makes them easier for people to respond to.  Preferably, email around some questions a day or two before class so that people can think about them while they are reading the materials (if you email them to me, I will forward them to the rest of the class).
+
 
+
* Ask people what surprised them, and why.  If you're not leading, think how you'd answer this question.  If people complain about the readings, ask them how things could have been done better, or what needs to be done next.
+
 
+
* Where possible, try to relate your topic to those we have discussed in previous weeks so that the ideas covered by the class build over the course of the semester.
+
 
+
* Being purposefully provocative (even if you don't believe what you're saying) can often help to get people talking.  If the material is appropriate, set the discussion up as a debate - tell half the class that they have to argue one side and the other half that they have to argue the opposite.  This approach can force people to really think about the ideas and about their preconceptions.  If you are going to do this, it is best to warn people ahead of time (though don't tell them which side they will be on).
+
 
+
* When you ask a question, give people lots of time to respond.  A good rule is to (slowly) count to 10 in your head before moving on.  This is because (a) it often takes people this long to formulate something to say and (b) the uncomfortable silence (and it can be excruciating) is often what it takes to get people talking.  This sounds (and can feel) horrible, but it really works, and the discussions that result are much richer.
+
 
+
* If no one answers a question, and there is a simple yes/no, do you agree/disagree, type answer, then ask for a show of hands - then you can focus in on individuals and ask them to explain their response.
+
 
+
*  Don't pick on individuals and make them comment unless you have to.  But if no one says anything, then it is OK to do this.  Everyone else is responsible for reading and thinking about the material too, so it should not be a surprise to them.  Even though you are in charge of running things, the responsibility for maintaining a discussion lies with everyone in the room.
+
 
+
*  Finally, in weeks when you are not leading, make sure that you have thought about the material enough that you can help the leader out.  Come with at least 2 or 3 ideas to talk about if things get too quiet.  If the leader has sent out questions, actually think about them before class.  And be responsible about doing the reading.  If you do all this stuff, others will do the same when it's your turn to lead.
+
 
+
The hardest part is getting the conversation started.  Once it's going, it will often run itself - and if it is doing this you should let it.  I've been running seminars for a few years now, and I'm only just getting to where I realize that my job is to say as little as possible.  If I talk the whole time, then I'm essentially lecturing ... and this is not a lecture format ... the goals are very different, they are to get people thinking on their feet and discussing ideas to help them learn the stuff for themselves.  But, it is your job to make sure that we are not just subjected to silence.
+
 
+
'''PowerPoint:'''  I don't really mind whether you use PowerPoint or not, but if you do, it should be to help maintain a conversation.  If there are figures that you want to ask questions about, then putting them up on a screen can really help.  Likewise, having your questions on screen for people to refer to can be useful.  I will reserve a projector for each class session, but you will need to go and get it from the EEB office before class.  If you do not have a laptop, let me know and I will bring mine. 
+
 
+
'''Grading:'''  The course is S/U and it is unusual for people to fail.  But, if you hardly ever participate in the discussions, I will fail you.  '''''This is your only warning!!'''''
+
 
+
 
+
'' If you have never led a discussion in a seminar course before, or feel nervous about doing so, please talk to me beforehand. It isn't as hard as it might seem, and it's always easier if you're well prepared and know what to expect.''
+
 
+
== Discussion/News ==
+
 
+
If you have any information related to the course (e.g., relevant news items, related web links, etc.), feel free to post it here.  Please put the date first, then your name;  be concise; and organize the list so that items are in reverse chronological order.  If you're not an EEB graduate student, then you can email items to me and I will add them, but please send them to me in the right format.
+
 
+
== Course history ==
+
 
+
If you are interested in the topics that we have covered in this class in past years, I have preserved previous versions of the web page, linked below.
+
 
+
During 2008, the topic was the history of the U.S. Endangered Species Act. To see what we covered during that course, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/eebedia/index.php/EEB_489:_Conservation_and_the_Endangered_Species_Act_(Spring_2008) click here].
+
 
+
During 2007, the topic was the biological consequences of climate change.  To see what we covered during that course, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/courses/EEB489/ click here].
+
 
+
During 2006, the topic was the conservation implications of invasive species. To see what we covered during that course, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/courses/EEB489/EEB489_2006_syllabus_invasives.htm click here].
+
 
+
During 2005, the topic was relating general conservation approaches to local problems in New England. To see what we covered during that course, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/courses/EEB489/EEB489_2005_syllabus.htm click here].
+
 
+
During 2004, the topic was the role of science in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. To see what we covered during that course, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/courses/EEB489/EEB489_2004_syllabus.htm click here]; for a reading list, [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/courses/EEB489/ESA_readings.htm click here].
+
 
+
== Other information ==
+
 
+
For information about EEB's Joint B.S./M.S. degree program in Biodiversity and Conservation Biology [http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/department/BSMS/ click here]
+
 
+
For information about the Society for Conservation Biology [http://www.conbio.org/?CFID=6617594&CFTOKEN=86148795 click here]
+
 
+
For information on jobs in conservation biology [http://www.conbio.org/resources/?CFID=6617594&CFTOKEN=86148795 click here]
+
 
+
For information on jobs in wildlife biology [http://wfsc.tamu.edu/jobboard/index.htm click here]
+
  
 +
The web page for EEB 5370 has moved to a new site [http://elphick.lab.uconn.edu/eeb-5370-current-topics-in-conservation-biology/ here] for spring 2016.
  
 
[[Category:EEB Seminars]]
 
[[Category:EEB Seminars]]

Latest revision as of 02:27, 19 January 2016

EEB 5370

The web page for EEB 5370 has moved to a new site here for spring 2016.