Difference between revisions of "Bio 196 Science News Summary"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
News Article Title_________________________________
 
News Article Title_________________________________
  
Did you spend more time, less time, or about the same amount of time to read today’s Science Section as you did last week’s?
+
There was a very diverse range of article subjects in this week's Science Times section, from camouflage mechanisms in cephalopods to  treatment for bedsores. What about the article you chose drew you to that article?
  
  
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
 +
Did you read the Letters section of the Science Section? If yes, did any of them cause you to rethink your impression of an article you read last week?
  
  
In two sentences or less, tell me why you picked the article you named above to summarize? (there was a pretty diverse range of topics in this weeks edition).
 
  
  
Line 19: Line 19:
  
  
 +
Did the article you named above challenge any ideas/beliefs you held before reading it? If yes, briefly describe which one(s)?
  
  
  
In two sentences or less, tell me why the subject of the article you picked was important enough to be reported on in the New York Times. If you have no idea why the reporter thought it was important, say so.
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Did the article you named above make you feel anything at all (for example, sad, curious, inspired, offended)? If yes, what did you feel, and what about the article made you feel that way?

Revision as of 17:03, 20 February 2008


Name _____________________________________________

News Article Title_________________________________

There was a very diverse range of article subjects in this week's Science Times section, from camouflage mechanisms in cephalopods to treatment for bedsores. What about the article you chose drew you to that article?



Did you read the Letters section of the Science Section? If yes, did any of them cause you to rethink your impression of an article you read last week?




Did the article you named above challenge any ideas/beliefs you held before reading it? If yes, briefly describe which one(s)?





Did the article you named above make you feel anything at all (for example, sad, curious, inspired, offended)? If yes, what did you feel, and what about the article made you feel that way?