Difference between revisions of "Bio 196 Science News Summary"
From EEBedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Oct | + | Oct 16, 2007 |
| − | + | ||
| + | Name _____________________________________________ | ||
| + | |||
| + | News Article Title_________________________________ | ||
| + | |||
| + | In general, when you encounter an article that contains complex information and ideas, do you read on through it, or do you give up and read another article instead? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Was there anything about the article you named above that seemed difficult to understand? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | If your answer to the question above was NO, is that because the subject is simple, or because the reporter did a good job explaining the subject? If your answer to the above was YES, what do you think the reporter could have done to make it easier to understand? | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 16 October 2007
Oct 16, 2007
Name _____________________________________________
News Article Title_________________________________
In general, when you encounter an article that contains complex information and ideas, do you read on through it, or do you give up and read another article instead?
Was there anything about the article you named above that seemed difficult to understand?
If your answer to the question above was NO, is that because the subject is simple, or because the reporter did a good job explaining the subject? If your answer to the above was YES, what do you think the reporter could have done to make it easier to understand?
