Difference between revisions of "Classic Works in Evolutionary Biology"
KurtSchwenk (Talk | contribs) (→'''We Need More Annotations!''') |
KurtSchwenk (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | This page grew out of a graduate seminar taught in EEB during the spring semester, 2008, by Kurt Schwenk. There was a general consensus that it would be useful to graduate students and the EEB community at large to have continuing access to the papers and book selections that were read during the semester, as well as additional papers included in the master list of 'classic' works in | + | This page grew out of a graduate seminar taught in EEB during the spring semester, 2008, by Kurt Schwenk. There was a general consensus that it would be useful to graduate students and the EEB community at large to have continuing access to the papers and book selections that were read during the semester, as well as additional papers included in the master list of 'classic' works in evolutionary biology. Many of these pdfs are available here (see below).<br/><br/> |
+ | [[Image:Masters_Voice.jpg|right|]] | ||
== '''What is 'The Master List'?''' == | == '''What is 'The Master List'?''' == | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
+ | |||
The 'master list' is a list of classic works in evolutionary biology that I (Kurt Schwenk) compiled and partially annotated during the course of the semester. It was created based on my own choices, as well as suggestions from EEB colleagues and various web sources. Obviously there are potentially as many lists of 'classic works' as there are evolutionary biologists - this particular list is not intended to be definitive. It reflects, to some degree, my own personal biases. However, an attempt was made to be inclusive; for example, there are a number of very important botanical references (thanks largely to Carl Schlichting), as well as obviously important works in population genetics, molecular biology and other areas I can hardly claim expertise in. As much as possible, I included only works that are generally important to evolutionary biology, as a whole, rather than the many papers that are of more circumscribed, if nonetheless critical, importance to a particular subdisciplines (e.g., phylogenetic analysis) or within a particular taxon (I admit that a couple of important vertebrate papers somehow wandered into the list...). I excluded books and papers that are too recent. Thus, while there is no doubt that Schlichting and Pigliucci's ''Phenotypic Evolution'' (1998) (for example) will be considered a classic in the future, it is simply too recently published to have achieved such status at this time (we might want to add a separate section entitled with the oxymoron 'Modern Classics' for such works). Finally, I note that several of the listed works are followed by an indented sublist of related papers that are , themselves, not necessarily 'classics', but are nevertheless helpful in interpreting or appreciating the significance of the listed work. This is an area where emmendations/additions/annotations might be particularly useful<br/><br/> | The 'master list' is a list of classic works in evolutionary biology that I (Kurt Schwenk) compiled and partially annotated during the course of the semester. It was created based on my own choices, as well as suggestions from EEB colleagues and various web sources. Obviously there are potentially as many lists of 'classic works' as there are evolutionary biologists - this particular list is not intended to be definitive. It reflects, to some degree, my own personal biases. However, an attempt was made to be inclusive; for example, there are a number of very important botanical references (thanks largely to Carl Schlichting), as well as obviously important works in population genetics, molecular biology and other areas I can hardly claim expertise in. As much as possible, I included only works that are generally important to evolutionary biology, as a whole, rather than the many papers that are of more circumscribed, if nonetheless critical, importance to a particular subdisciplines (e.g., phylogenetic analysis) or within a particular taxon (I admit that a couple of important vertebrate papers somehow wandered into the list...). I excluded books and papers that are too recent. Thus, while there is no doubt that Schlichting and Pigliucci's ''Phenotypic Evolution'' (1998) (for example) will be considered a classic in the future, it is simply too recently published to have achieved such status at this time (we might want to add a separate section entitled with the oxymoron 'Modern Classics' for such works). Finally, I note that several of the listed works are followed by an indented sublist of related papers that are , themselves, not necessarily 'classics', but are nevertheless helpful in interpreting or appreciating the significance of the listed work. This is an area where emmendations/additions/annotations might be particularly useful<br/><br/> |
Revision as of 00:55, 30 April 2008
![]() |
This article is still under construction. Expect it to change frequently until this notice is removed. |
Contents
What is This Page?
This page grew out of a graduate seminar taught in EEB during the spring semester, 2008, by Kurt Schwenk. There was a general consensus that it would be useful to graduate students and the EEB community at large to have continuing access to the papers and book selections that were read during the semester, as well as additional papers included in the master list of 'classic' works in evolutionary biology. Many of these pdfs are available here (see below).
What is 'The Master List'?
The 'master list' is a list of classic works in evolutionary biology that I (Kurt Schwenk) compiled and partially annotated during the course of the semester. It was created based on my own choices, as well as suggestions from EEB colleagues and various web sources. Obviously there are potentially as many lists of 'classic works' as there are evolutionary biologists - this particular list is not intended to be definitive. It reflects, to some degree, my own personal biases. However, an attempt was made to be inclusive; for example, there are a number of very important botanical references (thanks largely to Carl Schlichting), as well as obviously important works in population genetics, molecular biology and other areas I can hardly claim expertise in. As much as possible, I included only works that are generally important to evolutionary biology, as a whole, rather than the many papers that are of more circumscribed, if nonetheless critical, importance to a particular subdisciplines (e.g., phylogenetic analysis) or within a particular taxon (I admit that a couple of important vertebrate papers somehow wandered into the list...). I excluded books and papers that are too recent. Thus, while there is no doubt that Schlichting and Pigliucci's Phenotypic Evolution (1998) (for example) will be considered a classic in the future, it is simply too recently published to have achieved such status at this time (we might want to add a separate section entitled with the oxymoron 'Modern Classics' for such works). Finally, I note that several of the listed works are followed by an indented sublist of related papers that are , themselves, not necessarily 'classics', but are nevertheless helpful in interpreting or appreciating the significance of the listed work. This is an area where emmendations/additions/annotations might be particularly useful
A Comment on Modifying the Master List
A great advantage of using an EEBedia page for this purpose is that it can be edited and added to by the EEB community (thank you Paul Lewis!). However, I have a request - as much as I would like to see additions, changes, annotations, etc., I ask that a copy of the 'original' master list be preserved. Thus, my suggestion is to post a new list with an appropriate new title, or simply to post a list of addenda. I will work on including a text version of the list within the EEBedia page so that it can be directly edited by users while preserving a downloadable pdf version of the original master list.
If you make additions to the list, I strongly encourage you to upload pdfs of the new papers whenever possible. Since one of the principle purposes of this page is to educate and one specific way to do this is to help graduate students preparing for their oral qualifying exams. Making sources easy to obtain would be a great service to students and other users. Not everything is available in electronic format, obviously, but often more is available than one might think (i.e., pdfs are sometimes available through web sources outside of JSTOR or other standard electronic databases) and can be located by doing a Google search on the paper title. Scanned documents are good, but watch out for memory hogs - they might clog up the system if they are uploaded to EEBedia.
We Need More Annotations!
An especially valuable way to edit the master list would be to add annotations associated with the listed works. Annotations that are especially useful are short notes explaining the significance of the work, or which put it into an historical or conceptual context. Other useful annotations include abstracts or summaries, and URL's for sites that provide complementary material. So pick a familiar paper (or one you want to make yourself expert in) and start annotating!