Difference between revisions of "Scientific Communication and Ethics 2007"

From EEBedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
==Reading list==
 
==Reading list==
 +
 +
 +
Alberts, B. and K. Shine.  1994.  Scientists and the integrity of research.  Science 266:1660-1661. [http://sfx5.exlibrisgroup.com:3210/uconn?sid=google&auinit=B&aulast=Alberts&atitle=Scientists+and+the+integrity+of+research.&id=pmid:7992048 link]
 +
 +
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy.  1995.  On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research.  National Academy Press, Washington, DC.  Second Edition.  www.nap.edu
 +
 +
Davis, G.  2005.  Doctors without orders.  [Highlights of the Sigma Xi Postdoc Survey].  Special Supplement to American Scientist (May-June), pp. 1-13.  http://postdoc.sigmaxi.org
 +
 +
Eco-Ethics International Union.  http://www.int-res.com [EEIU]
 +
 +
Elliott, Deni and Judy E. Stern (editors).  1997.  Research Ethics:  A Reader.  University Press of New England. 
 +
 +
Environment Institute of Australia.  1998.  The Ethics of Environmental Research.  Proceedings of 1997 Fenner Conference on Environmental Research Ethics.  Australian Journal of Environmental Management.  Vol. 5, 84 pp.
 +
 +
Fairchild, A. and R. Bayer.  2004.  Ethics and the Conduct of Public Health Surveillance.  Science 303:631-632. [http://sfx5.exlibrisgroup.com:3210/uconn?sid=google&auinit=AL&aulast=Fairchild&atitle=PUBLIC+HEALTH:+Ethics+and+the+Conduct+of+Public+Health+Surveillance&id=pmid:14752148 link]
 +
 +
Galindo-Leal, C.  1996.  Explicit authorship.  Bull. Ecol. Amer., October, pp. 219-220.
 +
 +
Gladwell, M.  2004.  Something borrowed.  (Should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life?)  The New Yorker, November 22, 2004, pp. 40-48.
 +
 +
Horn, K.  2001.  The consequences of citing hedged statements in scientific research articles.  BioScience 51(12):1086-1093. [http://sfx5.exlibrisgroup.com:3210/uconn?sid=google&auinit=K&aulast=Horn&atitle=The+Consequences+of+Citing+Hedged+Statements+in+Scientific+Research+Articles&title=BioScience&volume=51&issue=12&date=2001&spage=1086&issn=0006-3568 link]
 +
 +
Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National Academies.  2002.  Integrity in Scientific Research.  Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct.
 +
 +
Kaiser, J.  2000.  Ecologists on a mission to save the world.  Science 287:1188-1192.
 +
 +
Kempner, J., C. S. Perlis and J. F. Merz.  2005.  Forbidden knowledge.  Science 307:854.
 +
 +
Kitcher, P.  2004.  Responsible biology.  BioScience 54(4):331-336.
 +
 +
Leopold, Aldo.  1966.  pp. 237-264.  The Land Ethic, In: A Sand County Almanac.  Oxford University Press.
 +
 +
Likens, G. E.  1992.  The Ecosystem Approach:  Its Use and Abuse.  Excellence in Ecology,              Vol. 3.  Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.  167 pp.
 +
 +
Macrina, F. L.  2005.  Scientific Integrity.  3rd Edition.  ASM Press, Washington, D.C.  402 pp.
 +
 +
Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson and R. de Vries.  2005.  Scientists behaving badly.  Nature 435:737-738.
 +
 +
Matisoff, G.  2001.  Is it publishable?  J. Great Lakes Res. 27(1):1-2.
 +
 +
Medawar, P. B.  1979.  Advice to a Young Scientist.  Basic Books, A Division of Harpur Collins Publisher.
 +
 +
Minteer, B. A. and J. P. Collins.  2005.  Why we need an “ecological ethics.”  Front. Ecol. Environ. 3(6):332-337.
 +
 +
Mooney, C.  2005.  The Republican War on Science.  Basic Books, Cambridge, MA.  342 pp.
 +
 +
National Academy of Sciences.  1997.  Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend.  [On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering].  National Academy Press.
 +
 +
Resnik, D. B.  1998.  The Ethics of Science.  An Introduction.  Routledge, London.  221 pp.
 +
 +
Schatz, G.  2006.  Jeff’s View on Science and Scientists.  Elsevier, London.  192 pp.
 +
 +
Shatz, D.  2004.  Peer Review. A critical inquiry.  Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc. NY. 247 pp.
 +
 +
Shea, W. R. and B. Sitter (eds.).  1989.  Scientists and Their Responsibility.  Watson Publishing International.  Canton, MA.
 +
 +
Smith, M. F., V. T. Eviner, K. C. Weathers, M. Uriarte, H. A. Ewing, J. M. Jeschke, P. Groffman and C. G. Jones.  2005.  Creating individual awareness about responsible conduct in research:  A case study of one institution’s approach for researchers and administrators.  J. Res. Admin. 36(1):21-25.
 +
 +
Steneck, Nicholas H.  2003.  ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research.  (Office of Research Integrity)
 +
 +
Warner, J. S., G. M. Lovett and J. Cadwallader.  1991.  Scientists and journalists:  A primer for scientists who talk to reporters.  Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 72(2):116-118.
 +
 +
Young, J. R.  2001.  The cat-and-mouse game of plagiarism detection.  Chronicle of Higher Education, July 6, 2001.  A16.
  
  

Revision as of 15:15, 30 October 2007

Lectures, discussions and analysis and presentation of case studies in the areas of scientific ethics and communication with the media. Topics in scientific ethics include misconduct, fraud, plagiarism, authorship, intellectual property rights, and academic codes of ethics.

Meetings from 5:00 to 6:30 PM on 29, 30, 31 October and 5, 6 and 7 November 2007, in TLS 301.

Discussions led by Dr. Gene E. Likens, Distinguished Research Professor


Agenda

More information coming soon.

Reading list

Alberts, B. and K. Shine. 1994. Scientists and the integrity of research. Science 266:1660-1661. link

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1995. On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Second Edition. www.nap.edu

Davis, G. 2005. Doctors without orders. [Highlights of the Sigma Xi Postdoc Survey]. Special Supplement to American Scientist (May-June), pp. 1-13. http://postdoc.sigmaxi.org

Eco-Ethics International Union. http://www.int-res.com [EEIU]

Elliott, Deni and Judy E. Stern (editors). 1997. Research Ethics: A Reader. University Press of New England.

Environment Institute of Australia. 1998. The Ethics of Environmental Research. Proceedings of 1997 Fenner Conference on Environmental Research Ethics. Australian Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 5, 84 pp.

Fairchild, A. and R. Bayer. 2004. Ethics and the Conduct of Public Health Surveillance. Science 303:631-632. link

Galindo-Leal, C. 1996. Explicit authorship. Bull. Ecol. Amer., October, pp. 219-220.

Gladwell, M. 2004. Something borrowed. (Should a charge of plagiarism ruin your life?) The New Yorker, November 22, 2004, pp. 40-48.

Horn, K. 2001. The consequences of citing hedged statements in scientific research articles. BioScience 51(12):1086-1093. link

Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research. Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct.

Kaiser, J. 2000. Ecologists on a mission to save the world. Science 287:1188-1192.

Kempner, J., C. S. Perlis and J. F. Merz. 2005. Forbidden knowledge. Science 307:854.

Kitcher, P. 2004. Responsible biology. BioScience 54(4):331-336.

Leopold, Aldo. 1966. pp. 237-264. The Land Ethic, In: A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press.

Likens, G. E. 1992. The Ecosystem Approach: Its Use and Abuse. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 3. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany. 167 pp.

Macrina, F. L. 2005. Scientific Integrity. 3rd Edition. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. 402 pp.

Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson and R. de Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737-738.

Matisoff, G. 2001. Is it publishable? J. Great Lakes Res. 27(1):1-2.

Medawar, P. B. 1979. Advice to a Young Scientist. Basic Books, A Division of Harpur Collins Publisher.

Minteer, B. A. and J. P. Collins. 2005. Why we need an “ecological ethics.” Front. Ecol. Environ. 3(6):332-337.

Mooney, C. 2005. The Republican War on Science. Basic Books, Cambridge, MA. 342 pp.

National Academy of Sciences. 1997. Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend. [On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering]. National Academy Press.

Resnik, D. B. 1998. The Ethics of Science. An Introduction. Routledge, London. 221 pp.

Schatz, G. 2006. Jeff’s View on Science and Scientists. Elsevier, London. 192 pp.

Shatz, D. 2004. Peer Review. A critical inquiry. Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc. NY. 247 pp.

Shea, W. R. and B. Sitter (eds.). 1989. Scientists and Their Responsibility. Watson Publishing International. Canton, MA.

Smith, M. F., V. T. Eviner, K. C. Weathers, M. Uriarte, H. A. Ewing, J. M. Jeschke, P. Groffman and C. G. Jones. 2005. Creating individual awareness about responsible conduct in research: A case study of one institution’s approach for researchers and administrators. J. Res. Admin. 36(1):21-25.

Steneck, Nicholas H. 2003. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. (Office of Research Integrity)

Warner, J. S., G. M. Lovett and J. Cadwallader. 1991. Scientists and journalists: A primer for scientists who talk to reporters. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 72(2):116-118.

Young, J. R. 2001. The cat-and-mouse game of plagiarism detection. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 6, 2001. A16.